In a significant win for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), the Supreme Court granted bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on September 13, 2024, regarding a case linked to the now-abandoned liquor excise policy. Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan agreed on granting bail but disagreed about the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). While the court acknowledged the ongoing proceedings, it emphasized the importance of personal liberty, noting that prolonged detention was unjustified. This ruling allows Kejriwal to be released from jail after previously being granted interim bail in a money laundering case. Conditions of his bail include a ₹10 lakh bond and restrictions on public comments about the case.
The Supreme Court delivered a significant verdict for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on September 13, 2024, granting regular bail to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case related to the now-abandoned liquor excise policy. This case was filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), causing a stir in Indian politics. The court decision allows Mr. Kejriwal to exit jail after previously receiving interim bail in another case involving money laundering led by the Enforcement Directorate (ED).
While the two justices involved agreed on granting bail, they differed in opinions regarding the legality of Kejriwal’s arrest. Advocate Dr. A.M. Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, argued that the arrest was unlawful as it did not comply with the necessary legal requirements, given that he was already in custody. In contrast, the CBI maintained that judicial permission for the arrest was obtained just before it took place, which Justice Surya Kant upheld.
Justice Ujjal Bhuyan raised concerns about the timing of the arrest and suggested it seemed like an effort to obstruct Kejriwal’s impending release based on the prior case. He also reiterated the importance of following due process by the CBI, which is expected to function with high integrity. The court emphasized that an accused must not be coerced into self-incrimination.
Both judges agreed that holding Kejriwal in jail for an extended period without trial violated his right to personal liberty. He will be released on a bail bond of ₹10 lakh and is restricted from making public comments about the case to prevent influencing the judicial process. Although he can now walk free, the conditions include not visiting his office or handling official files unless necessary.
This ruling marks a crucial moment for AAP and showcases the ongoing legal battles facing its leaders, following others who have also secured bail in relation to this liquor policy case.
Tags: Arvind Kejriwal, Aam Aadmi Party, Supreme Court, Bail, CBI, Delhi Excise Policy, Legal News, India Politics
-
What happened with Arvind Kejriwal’s bail in the corruption case?
The Supreme Court decided to grant bail to Arvind Kejriwal in his corruption case, allowing him to go free while his case continues in court. -
Why was this bail important for him?
This bail is important because it lets him stay active in politics and continue his work as the Chief Minister of Delhi without being in jail. -
What does this mean for the corruption case?
The granting of bail doesn’t mean he is found innocent; it simply means he is allowed to remain free as the legal process continues. -
Are there any conditions attached to his bail?
Yes, there are usually conditions that come with bail, like not leaving the country or appearing in court when required, but the specific conditions for Kejriwal were not detailed in the news. - What can we expect next in the case?
Next, there will be a trial or hearings where evidence will be presented, and the court will eventually decide on the matter based on the law and facts of the case.
