In Bhubaneswar, Santrupt Misra, political secretary of the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), criticized the BJP government by stating that simply changing the names of development schemes won’t bring about real progress. He emphasized that Odisha has shown significant improvement in per capita income and economic stability over the past two decades, attributing this success to the efforts of the previous BJD administration. In response, BJP spokesperson Anil Biswal insisted that the new initiatives, such as the Subhadra scheme, are genuine and not mere name changes, questioning the BJD’s record on issues like malnutrition and unemployment. This exchange highlights the ongoing political tensions between the two parties in Odisha.
In Bhubaneswar, Santrupt Misra, the political secretary to BJD president Naveen Patnaik, criticized the BJP government, stating that merely changing the names of government schemes won’t lead to progress; actual implementation is what’s needed. This response comes after the BJP pointed out what they termed the achievements of the new Mohan Majhi government in its first 100 days. Misra cited a report from the Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, highlighting that Odisha’s per capita income has improved significantly, reaching 88.5% compared to the national average since 2001.
He asserted that Odisha has moved from financial instability to economic strength over the last 24 years, thanks to the policies of the previous BJD administration. Misra emphasized that while the BJD has been dedicated to Odisha’s development for nearly 9,000 days, the BJP government is only now beginning to tally its accomplishments after just 100 days in office. In response, BJP spokesperson Anil Biswal stated that the Subhadra scheme is entirely new and not just a name change, and he questioned why the BJD has not addressed ongoing issues like malnutrition and unemployment during its period in power.
This ongoing political tug-of-war highlights the differing perspectives on governance and achievements in Odisha. As the political landscape shifts, the BJP and BJD continue to clash over the direction and effectiveness of their respective policies.
Tags: BJD, BJP, Odisha politics, Naveen Patnaik, Santrupt Misra, economic development, government schemes, political criticism
What is the main issue between BJD and BJP regarding government policies?
BJD is criticizing the government’s policies, saying they are not helping the people, while BJP is highlighting their achievements over the last 100 days.
What has BJD mentioned about the government’s actions?
BJD has pointed out that the government is not addressing important issues and feels that their policies are not benefiting the public.
What achievements is BJP focusing on in their response?
BJP is pointing to the work they have completed in the past 100 days, claiming they have made significant progress and improvements.
How are the two parties communicating their positions?
Both parties are using public statements and media to share their views, with BJD expressing concerns and BJP promoting their successes.
What does this political disagreement mean for the public?
This disagreement highlights different approaches to governance, which can affect how policies impact everyday people’s lives and services.
 "Amid escalating tensions, the Philippines defies China, asserting its right to bolster defenses with US missile deployments in contested waters.")
