Market News

Exploring the Complexities: IMF-FSB Paper Reveals Crypto’s Ineligibility as Legal Tender, Highlighting the Challenges of Implementing a Blanket Ban

Ban, Blanket, Challenges, Complexities, Cryptos, Exploring, Highlighting, IMFFSB, Implementing, Ineligibility, Legal, Paper, Reveals, Tender

SEO Friendly News Article

Crypto Assets Should Not Be Granted Official Currency Status, Says IMF-FSB Report


Crypto assets should not be granted official currency or legal tender status, the much-awaited synthesis paper by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Financial Stability Board (FSB) has said ahead of the G20 leadership summit under India’s presidency. However, the report has argued against a blanket ban on activities linked to crypto assets, explaining that such a move can be costly as well as technically demanding to enforce.

Central Banks and Crypto Assets

Central banks should avoid holding crypto assets in their official reserve as they pose a risk to monetary and global financial stability, according to the synthesis paper. Stressing the need for an unambiguous tax treatment of crypto assets, it has advised countries to safeguard monetary sovereignty.

Recommendations for Policymakers

  • Policymakers should guard against excessive capital flow volatility by clarifying the legal status of crypto assets.
  • Emerging markets and developing economies may face amplified macro-financial risks from crypto assets due to a less developed tax framework, large unbanked population, and larger cross-border transaction costs.

Fiscal Risks and Crypto Assets

The joint report of the IMF and FSB is part of the ongoing G20 deliberations on regulating crypto assets. Outlining the fiscal risks, the synthesis paper said that if crypto assets were granted legal tender status, government revenues could be exposed to exchange rate risk. Crypto assets do not fulfil the three basic conditions of currency, mainly unit of account, means of exchange, and store of value.

Banning Crypto-Related Activities

On banning crypto-related activities, the report has said that it is not an easy option, adding that temporary restrictions should not substitute for robust macroeconomic policies.

“Developing effective frameworks and policies is the best way to limit substitution into crypto assets,” the report said. Credible institutional frameworks and comprehensive regulation and oversight are the first line of defence against the macroeconomic and financial risks posed by crypto assets.

Comprehensive Regulatory and Supervisory Oversight

Calling for comprehensive regulatory and supervisory oversight of crypto assets, the report has recommended that countries should avoid large deficits and high debt levels and adopt an effective monetary policy framework to avoid the use of crypto assets for payment.

Minimizing Fiscal and Operational Risks

In cases of official crypto asset use, governments should minimize fiscal and operational risks, the report has highlighted. That is, government revenues should not be exposed to variations in crypto-asset prices.

International Standards and Risks

“The growing use and integration of crypto assets in the global financial system has necessitated a coordinated set of international standards that form a comprehensive policy toolkit, as well as the effective implementation of these standards,” the joint report said. The borderless nature of the crypto-asset ecosystem limits the effectiveness of individual national regulation, it added.

The FSB and IMF have also drawn attention towards money laundering, terrorist financing, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction risks associated with virtual assets. The report has asked countries to identify and take appropriate steps to manage and mitigate those risks, including the adoption of Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards.

Cautionary Note on Capital Flow Management

“Pseudonymous crypto assets can undermine tax revenue collection and compliance since withholding taxes and third-party information could be challenging to collect.”

In a cautionary note, the IMF-FSB paper has said that if capital flow management measures become less effective, jurisdictions may need to consider greater exchange rate flexibility, balancing the three competing objectives of monetary autonomy, exchange rate stability, and financial openness.

Building Institutional Capacity and Enhancing Global Coordination

As part of its roadmap, the IMF, FSB, other international organizations, and standards-setting bodies are working towards building institutional capacity beyond G20 jurisdictions, enhancing global coordination, cooperation, and information sharing; and addressing data gaps necessary to understand the rapidly changing crypto-asset ecosystem.


Leave a Comment