Market News

AI

A student challenges his university’s exam failure, claiming unjust penalties for alleged AI use, as the court intervenes.

academic integrity, AI in exams, Education Law, High Court, Intellectual Property Law, Legal Principles, O P Jindal Global University

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice to O P Jindal Global University following a petition from a postgraduate law student, Kaustubh Shakkarwar. He is challenging the university’s decision to fail him in an exam, claiming he was accused of using AI to generate answers. Shakkarwar argues that he was not given a fair hearing or access to necessary documents, violating natural justice principles. Now pursuing an LLM degree, he contends there are no clear rules against using AI during exams. The court will hear the case again on November 14. Shakkarwar is a practicing IP lawyer and AI entrepreneur.



High Court Notice to University Over AI Exam Controversy

In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice to O.P. Jindal Global University, located in Sonipat. This follows a petition from Kaustubh Shakkarwar, a postgraduate law student, who challenged the university’s decision to fail him in an exam. The university accused him of using artificial intelligence (AI) to generate responses to exam questions.

Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri presided over the case, where Shakkarwar argued that the university’s examination committee violated legal principles by not offering him a fair hearing and by failing to provide essential documents related to the allegations. Shakkarwar, who resides in Mumbai and is studying for his LLM in intellectual property rights and technology law, contends that the university hasn’t presented enough evidence to support its claims about AI usage in his submissions for the course "Law and Justice in a Globalising World."

Adding to the complexity, Shakkarwar, a practicing intellectual property lawyer and AI entrepreneur, questioned whether the university even has any clear rules banning the use of AI during exams. After being informed he failed the exam, he pursued an appeal, but he alleged that the appeal was dismissed without a hearing, after a delay of four months. The court has scheduled the next hearing for November 14.

This case raises important questions about academic integrity and the evolving role of AI in education, making it a pivotal issue for students and educational institutions alike.

Tags: High Court, O.P. Jindal Global University, AI in Exams, Education Law, Academic Integrity, Technology in Education

  1. What is the issue mentioned in the news about the university?
    The High Court has issued a notice to a university because some students were caught using AI tools during exams, which is against the rules.

  2. Why is using AI in exams a problem?
    Using AI in exams is considered cheating because it gives students an unfair advantage over others who are answering questions on their own.

  3. What could happen to the students involved?
    The students who used AI may face penalties, such as failing the exam or facing disciplinary action from the university.

  4. What is the university’s responsibility in this situation?
    The university needs to ensure fair and honest exam practices. They must investigate the issue and take appropriate actions against those involved in cheating.

  5. What are students advised to do in light of this news?
    Students should avoid using AI tools during exams and focus on studying and understanding the material to do well honestly.

Leave a Comment

DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto
DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto
DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto