Market News

AI

A student challenges his university’s exam failure, claiming unjust penalties for alleged AI use, as the court intervenes.

AI in exams, due process, intellectual property rights, Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri, law student petition, O P Jindal Global University, Punjab and Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice to O P Jindal Global University after a postgraduate law student, Kaustubh Shakkarwar, challenged the university’s decision to fail him in an exam. He was accused of using AI-generated content in his answers, but he argues that the university didn’t follow due process, as he wasn’t given a chance to defend himself or access relevant documents. Shakkarwar, who specializes in intellectual property rights, questioned whether there were clear rules against using AI in exams. He appealed the decision, but his appeal was dismissed without a proper hearing. The court will hear the matter again on November 14.



Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a notice to O P Jindal Global University in Sonipat. This is in response to a petition filed by Kaustubh Shakkarwar, a postgraduate law student. Shakkarwar is challenging the university’s decision to deem him unsuccessful in an exam. The reason given was that he allegedly used artificial intelligence (AI) to create his responses for exam questions.

Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri is overseeing the case. Shakkarwar claims that the university’s examination controller and an unfair means committee failed to follow proper legal procedures. Specifically, he argues that they did not allow him a chance to defend himself or present important documents related to his case.

Shakkarwar, who is from Mumbai and currently studying for an LLM in intellectual property rights and technology law, points out that the university has not provided clear evidence of his supposed use of AI during the exam on “Law and Justice in a Globalising World.” As a practicing intellectual property lawyer and AI entrepreneur, he questions whether there is even a rule against using AI in exams.

After learning he had failed the exam, Shakkarwar appealed the decision, but he states that his appeal was dismissed without a hearing after a lengthy four-month delay. The case is set for its next hearing on November 14.

Tags: Punjab and Haryana High Court, O P Jindal Global University, AI in exams, law student petition, Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri

  1. What does the High Court notice involve?
    The High Court issued a notice to a university because of a student who failed an exam. The court is looking into whether the student used AI inappropriately during the test.

  2. Why is the use of AI in exams a concern?
    Using AI in exams can be considered cheating because it gives students unfair help. This could affect their grades and the fairness of the educational process.

  3. What happens next for the university?
    The university will have to respond to the High Court’s notice. They may need to explain their policies on AI use in exams and how they handle cases of cheating.

  4. Could this affect other students at the university?
    Yes, if the court finds that the use of AI in exams is a serious issue, it might lead to changes in exam policies that could affect all students.

  5. What should students do if they are unsure about using AI?
    Students should check their university’s rules about using AI before an exam. If they are unsure, it’s best to ask a teacher for guidance to avoid any problems.

Leave a Comment

DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto
DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto
DeFi Explained: Simple Guide Green Crypto and Sustainability China’s Stock Market Rally and Outlook The Future of NFTs The Rise of AI in Crypto