As we head into 2025, the rise of AI is creating a double-edged sword for companies. With potentially 100 AI bots for every human user, this growth leads to serious security challenges. AI isn’t just being used as a tool; it’s becoming a target for attacks, and the threat landscape is evolving rapidly. Companies must grapple with new AI systems and the risk of insider threats from automated agents. To tackle these issues, a new security approach called “zero standing privilege” is suggested. Ultimately, trust will become the key currency in cybersecurity, as organizations aim to adapt to a landscape where AI reshapes how we think about security entirely.
As we approach 2025, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is setting the stage for a dual role: one of salvation and one of threat. Companies are rushing to integrate AI agents and copilots into their systems, but this rapid evolution is creating significant security concerns. For every human user within enterprise systems, experts predict there will be about 100 AI bots, leading to a potential security nightmare.
Omer Grossman, the global chief information officer at CyberArk, highlighted that in 2024, organizations witnessed an average of 45 machine identities per human. This figure is expected to surge as organizations fully adopt AI, creating a new layer of security challenges that Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) and AI engineers are still trying to comprehend.
The security landscape is evolving along three main threats:
-
AI weaponization by attackers: Cybercriminals are not just targeting systems but are now using AI to develop more sophisticated social engineering attacks, including voice cloning that can impersonate CEOs.
-
AI systems as targets: Attackers are now probing AI models for vulnerabilities, similar to how they have traditionally targeted networks. Techniques like prompt injection are on the rise.
- AI for defense: Security vendors are under pressure to integrate AI quickly to safeguard their systems, yet many are bolting AI features onto outdated architectures rather than redesigning their security frameworks.
Now, we are also facing a new issue reminiscent of shadow IT, but on a larger scale. Companies are struggling to manage numerous unforeseen AI tools that pop up within their ecosystems. Grossman points out that each of these copilots could access sensitive company data, creating a "spaghetti-like system architecture" that complicates access management and governance.
Another alarming development is the transformation of insider threats, where AI can autonomously be injected into systems. This could allow attackers to exploit existing agents for malicious purposes without needing to deploy new ones.
For developers, the challenge lies in balancing the need for innovation against security risks. Grossman proposes a “zero standing privilege” model, which gives developers access only when needed, helping to minimize potential post-authentication attacks.
Trust has emerged as the currency of cybersecurity. Organizations are realizing that building secure AI architectures requires ongoing trust verification. As we enter 2025, the lines between traditional and AI-specific security will continue to blur, and companies must adapt to this new reality.
To navigate the future of AI security, organizations need to embrace this shift. By recognizing that AI is fundamentally reshaping the entire security landscape, they can better prepare for an environment where machine identities surpass human ones.
Image credit: iStockphoto/Andreus
Tags: AI security, zero standing privilege, cybersecurity challenges, insider threats, machine identities
What does “Your CoPilot May Be Plotting Against You” mean?
This phrase suggests that sometimes, the tools or software we rely on might not work in our best interest. It reminds us to be cautious about trusting technology completely.
How can tech tools like CoPilots deceive us?
Tech tools can make mistakes or misinterpret our needs. If we depend on them blindly, they might lead us astray or give wrong advice without us realizing it.
What should I look for to ensure my CoPilot is helping, not plotting?
Check if the suggestions align with your goals. Look for patterns in its advice. If something feels off or unhelpful, it’s okay to question it and seek other options.
Can I trust AI tools in critical situations?
While AI can offer useful insights, it’s wise to use them as a guide, not a final answer. Always apply your judgment, especially in important decisions.
What can I do if I feel my CoPilot isn’t working for me?
You can adjust its settings, provide clearer feedback, or even look for alternative tools. Remember, you are in control, and it’s okay to challenge the technology you use.
