Naveen Patnaik’s Biju Janata Dal (BJD), which previously supported the “One Nation One Election” proposal, has changed its stance, echoing concerns from the Opposition. The party is questioning the details of the plan adopted by the Union Cabinet, worried about potential issues like hung assemblies and constitutional crises. BJD MP Sasmit Patra emphasized the need for careful scrutiny and wider consultation with stakeholders before rushing the proposal, recalling the problems faced with the farm laws. The government will need a two-thirds majority in Parliament to pass the necessary constitutional amendments, a challenging task given the current political dynamics. The BJD’s shift reflects its recent electoral defeat and a move towards more opposition against the BJP.
Title: BJD Challenges ‘One Nation One Election’ Proposal, Calls for Clarity
New Delhi: Naveen Patnaik’s Biju Janata Dal (BJD), which previously supported the ‘One Nation One Election’ concept, is now raising questions about it. The party wants to understand the finer details of the proposal recommended by the Kovind Committee, recently accepted by the Union cabinet. They are urging a cautious approach, warning against the rushed decision-making similar to the approach taken with the controversial farm laws.
The BJD, traditionally aligned with the BJP, faced a significant setback in the recent assembly elections, leading Patnaik to signal a shift in strategy. He has openly stated that the party will no longer support the BJP and will focus on opposition instead.
In a recent interview, BJD MP and spokesperson Sasmit Patra expressed concerns about the government’s handling of the ‘One Nation One Election’ proposal. He emphasized the need for clarity on what the plan entails, especially as it aims for simultaneous elections for Lok Sabha, state assemblies, and local bodies. Patra pointed out the potential complications that could arise from situations like hung assemblies or constitutional crises, stating that these issues need to be addressed before moving forward.
Moreover, Patra suggested that a broader consultation involving all political parties and other stakeholders in civil society is necessary. He criticized the government for potentially rushing this process, which could lead to problems down the line, much like the issues created by hastily implemented farm laws.
The opposition also voices strong concerns about the practicality and democratic nature of the ‘One Nation One Election’ plan. Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge labeled it as an attempt to distract the public. Implementing this plan would require several constitutional amendments, and securing the necessary two-thirds majority in parliament could be a significant challenge for the government.
The BJD, which once supported the BJP in the Rajya Sabha, has become more vocal in opposition since its electoral loss. The party’s shift reflects a broader sentiment among various political entities regarding the implications of this election synchronization proposal.
Tags: BJD, One Nation One Election, Naveen Patnaik, Kovind Committee, Odisha Politics, BJP, Parliament, Constitutional Amendments, Political Opposition
-
What is the "One Nation One Election" concept?
One Nation One Election is a proposal to hold elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies at the same time, instead of separately. -
Why has Naveen Patnaik’s party, BJD, changed its stance on this issue?
The BJD wants to know more details before fully supporting the idea. They are looking for clarity on how it will work. -
How do farm laws relate to the BJD’s concerns?
The BJD cites the recent challenges with farm laws as an example of how important it is to understand the fine details before making big changes. -
What specific details does BJD want regarding the One Nation One Election proposal?
The BJD is asking for a clearer explanation of how the proposal will affect voters, politicians, and the overall election process. - Is the BJD fully against the One Nation One Election idea?
No, they are not fully against it. They just want to ensure that they understand the implications and that it benefits everyone before taking a firm stand.
